![]() ![]() To evaluate an editor, just record some input noise on your sound card, save the signal to disk, load it back up and see that it "makes sense". You're likely to get much better results than me. The ASIO drivers on my RME card seem to be buggy at 24 bit recording, and KRISTAL is the only free editor that seems to give decent results at that format. I use KRISTAL Audio Engine for my recording, but I'm in a particularly weird situation. But 32-bit floats only have 24-bit mantissas anyway, so you lose no real information by downconverting from float to 24-bit. And some audio editors will want to record in floating point instead of 24- or 32-bit fixed point. FLAC -5 works just fine, -8 works slightly better and much slower.Ībout the only "gotcha" with lossless codecs is that very few of them (only LA, to be exact) support floating point input. A lot of it just depends on personal preference. I generally use FLAC for lossless compression, but I've switched to/from APE from time to time. I'm in it for the long run!ĭo you have a recommendation for audio editing software among the choices you mentioned? 24/96 feeds are recognized, which is the main thing. Which codec do you use for 24/96 recording? FLAC? I will absolutely be sticking with lossless compression.Ī quick search of the Squeezebox support site indicates that they downsample 24/96 feeds to 24/48, but that's OK for now. (I've researched this: I clean my records with a Nitty Gritty using distilled water from the vending machines in super markets (super-pure!), industrial-grade isopropyl alcohol, and a surfactant whose name I forget (Record Genii?). I agree 105% on the importance of record cleaning, it's huge. Track info and maybe cutting the cue-in, cue-out time. More general adoption of 24/96 by products like Squeezebox won't be for 2-4 years. My wild guess is that I will be able to start ripping in about a year using boutique products like foobar2000. So my question is, when will products be available to support ripping vinyl at a resolution of 24/96 and playing 24/96 rips? I'm guessing the MPEG4 standard will be the real-world basis for 24/96 support. Second, I'm going to wait until 24/96 codecs are available (at least), even if that's several years. I basically don't care about the price of disk storage: it's cheap compared to the cost of my time to rip the vinyl.įirst off, my impression is that the sonic gain from going beyond 24/96 is unimportant. I have a very high-end turntable/cartridge/equalization stage, and I want to archive the LPs with the maximum audio quality that they have to offer. One thing's for sure: once I rip an album, I never want to do it again. Ideally, I'd like all my LPs to be available digitally, but that isn't going to happen in this lifetime. In addition to ripping stuff that I don't have on CD, I'm expecting that my vinyl rips will often sound better than my CD rips, so I'm planning to rerip some of my very favorite stuff, like the Beatles. ![]() Now that I'm half-way through ripping my 1600 CDs to disk, my thoughts are turning to the next big project: ripping my vinyl. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |